2.  Betti E. Germenevtika kak obshchaya metodologiya nauk o dukhe [Hermeneutics as the General Methodology of the Geisteswissenschaften], Moscow, 2011, 144 p.
3.  Coing H. Die juristischen Auslegungsmethoden und die Lehre der allgemeinen Hermeneutic, KölnOpladen, 1959.
4. Müller F. Rechtstext und Textarbeit, Berlin, 1997.
5. Gadamer H.-G. Istina i metod: osnovy filosofskoy germenevtiki [Truth and Method: The Basics of
Philosophical Hermeneutics], Moscow, 1988, 704 p.
6.  Ricoeur P. Spravedlivoe [Fair], Moscow, 2005, 304 p.
7.  Ricoeur P. Torzhestvo yazyka nad nasiliem. Germenevticheskiy podkhod k filosofii prava [Triumph Over Violence. Hermeneutic Approach to the Philosophy of Law], Voprosy filosofii, 1996, no. 4, pp. 27-36.
8.  Kaufmann A. Beiträge zur juristischen Hermeneutic, Köln; Berlin; Bonn; München, 1984.
9. Mootz III F.-J. Law, Hermeneutics and Rhetoric, Burlington, 2010, 470 р.
10. Tontti J. Right and Prejudice: Prolegomena to a Hermeneutical Philosophy of Law, Burlington, 2004,
204 р.
11.  Atarshchikova E. N. Germenevtika v prave: istoriya i sovremennost [Hermeneutics in Law: Past and Present], Saint Petersburg, 1998, 296 p.
12.  Berniukov A. M. Zdiisnennia pravosuddia: hermenevtychnyi pidkhid [The Exercise of Justice: Hermeneutic Approach], Pravosuddia:filosofske ta teoretychne osmyslennia, Kyiv, 2009, pp. 148-206.
13.  Dudash T. I. Pravorozuminnia kriz pryzmu hermenevtyky [Understanding Law Through the Prism of Hermeneutics], Lviv, 2010, 248 p.
14.  Ovchinnikov A. I. Pravovoe myshlenie v germenevticheskoy paradigme [Legal Thinking in the Hermeneutic Paradigm], Rostov on Don, 2002, 288 p.
15.  Zirk-Sadowski M. Zavdannia hermenevtychnoi filosofii [The Task of Hermeneutical Philosophy], Filosofiia prava i zahalna teoriiaprava, 2012, no. 2, pp. 102-114.
16.  Gadamer H.-G. Praise of Theory, Praise of Theory: Speeches and Essays, New Haven, CT, 1998, pp. 16-36.
17.  Heidegger M. Bytie i vremya [Being and Time], Saint Petersburg, 2006, 452 p.
18.  Labarrier Zh.-L. Fronesys [Fronesis], Yevropeiskyi slovnyk filosofii: leksykon neperekladnostei, Kyiv 2009, vol. 1, pp. 527-533.
19.  Aristotel. Nikomakhova etika [Nicomachean Ethics], Sochineniya, Moscow, 1983, T. 4, pp. 53-293.
20.  Flyvbjerg B. Making Social Science Matter: Why Social Inquiry Fails and Haw It Can Succeed Again,
2001, 212 p.
21.  Amselek P. Nauchnyy status pravovykh issledovaniy [Scientific Status of Legal Research], Entsiklopediya pravovedeniya ili integralnaya yurisprudentsiya? Problemy izucheniya i prepodavaniya, Moscow, 2013,
pp. 208-220.
22.  Husserl E. Krizis evropeyskogo chelovechestva i filosofiya [The Crisis of European Sciences and Transcendental Philosophy], Voprosy filosofii, 1986, no. 3, pp. 101-116.
23.  Arendt H. Otvetstvennost i suzhdenie [Responsibility and Judgment], Moscow, 2013, 352 p.
24.  Arendt H. Istoki totalitarizma [The Origins of Totalitarianism], Moscow, 1996, 672 p.
25.  Ricoeur P. Germenevtika i metod sotsialnykh nauk [Hermeneutics and the Human Sciences], Pol Riker v Moskve, Moscow, 2013, pp. 49-61.
26.  Ricoeur P. Put priznaniya. Tri ocherka [The Path of Recognition. Three Essays], Moscow, 2010, 268 p.
27.  Thiselton A. Germenevtika [Hermeneutics], Cherkassy, 2011, 430 p.
28.  Gadamer H.-G. Aktualnost prekrasnogo [Relevance of Beautiful], Moscow, 1991, 367 p.IV. Антропологізація і соціологізація загальнотеоретичної юриспруденції: методологічний інструментарій